pROC 1.13.0 was just released with bug fixes and a new feature.

Infinite values in predictor

Following the release of pROC 1.12, it quickly became clear with issue #30 that infinite values were handled differently by the different algorithms of pROC. The problem with these values is that they cannot be thresholded. An Inf will always be greater than any value. This means that in some cases, it may not be possible to reach 0 or 100% specificity or sensitivity. This also revealed that threshold-agnostic algorithms such as algorithm="2" or the DeLong theta calculations would happily reach 0 or 100% specificity or sensitivity in those case, although those values are unattainable.

Starting with 1.13.0, when pROC's roc function finds any infinite value in the predictor argument, or in controls or cases, it will return NaN (not a number).

Numerical accuracy

The handling of near ties close to + or - Infinity or 0 has been improved by calculating the threshold (which is the mean between two consecutive values) differently depending on the mean value itself. This allows preserving as much precision close to 0 without maxing out large absolute values.

New argument for ggroc

ggroc can now take a new value for the aes argument, aes="group". Consistent with ggplot2, it allows to curves with identical aesthetics to be split in different groups. This is especially useful for instance in facetted plots.

library(pROC)
data(aSAH)
roc.list <- roc(outcome ~ s100b + ndka + wfns, data = aSAH)
g.list <- ggroc(roc.list)
g.group <- ggroc(roc.list, aes="group")
g.group + facet_grid(.~name)

Facetting of 3 ROC curves with ggroc.

Getting the update

The update has just been accepted on CRAN and should be online soon. Once it is out, update your installation by simply typing:

install.packages("pROC")

The full changelog is:

• roc now returns NaN when predictor contains infinite values ( issue #30).
• Better handling of near-ties near +-Infinity and 0.
• ggroc supports aes="group" to allow curves with identical aesthetics.

A major regression slipped into yesterday's release 1.12.0 of pROC. The fix of issue #25 allocated a matrix which could quickly become very large for bigger datasets, and cause significant slow downs as the machine allocated the memory, or even crash pROC with an error message such as cannot allocate vector of size ... for larger datasets. This bug (issue #29) is fixed (and now automatically tested for) in pROC 1.12.1.

Please update your installation by simply typing:

install.packages("pROC")

I just released pROC 1.12.0, which fixes several bugs and should significantly improve the performance on large datasets by selecting the best algorithm automatically.

Issue 25

GitHub issue #25 identified two distinct bugs causing ci.auc, var and other functions to fail when calculating DeLong placements with the following error message, with different variation of numbers:

Error in delongPlacements(roc) :
 A problem occured while calculating DeLong's theta: got 0.50057161522129678399 instead of 0.50032663726931247972. This is a bug in pROC, please report it to the maintainer.

pROC calculates the AUC with the trapezoidal method. This is the AUC obtained when calling auc(roc). When using the DeLong method (for roc.test, var etc.), the AUC is also calculated with an other method (similar to the Wilcoxon/Mann-Whitney statistic). These two values should be identical, at least down to something close to the floating point precision of the hardware, typically below 10^-8. To be on the safe side, pROC checks this assumption after calculating the DeLong AUC.

The first sub-issue caused by a broken conversion of the roc curve from percent to fractions for internal calculations, followed by a broken check that the DeLong code produced the correct AUC. In combination, these two bugs caused pROC to stop with an error message in the specific case where percent=TRUE and direction=">". The check was introduced in pROC version 1.9.1. The bug in the conversion from percent to fraction was present in earlier versions, however it never affected calculations, which is why it was left unnoticed until the check was added. Both bugs are now fixed.

The second sub-issue was impacting the calculation of the thresholds. When two predictor values were too close, their mean could not be represented exactly in the IEEE 754 arithmetic and the result would rounded back to one or the other value, pretty much arbitrarily depending on the implementation.

 a <- c(0.65354946699793847742, 0.65354946699793858844)
> print(mean(a), digits = 20)
[1] 0.65354946699793847742
> mean(a) == a
[1]  TRUE FALSE

Because pROC calculates the ROC thresholds as the mean between consecutive predictor observations, this would cause some comparisons to be incorrect when calculating sensitivity and specificity. As a consequence, erroneous sensitivities, sensitivities and AUCs may have been reported in the past. The issue was fixed by carefully selecting the correct value for threshold in case the mean was identical to a predictor value.

Other bug fixes

• GitHub issue #27 caused ci.auc to return NaN when cases or controls contained only a single observation. The function has been fixed and now returns NA as expected.
• power.roc.curve failed with ROC curves having percent=TRUE. This issue was identified when adding testthat unit tests for the function.
• ci(..., of="coords") returned the ci function instead of calculating the CI.
• C++ code now check for user interrupts regularly with Rcpp::checkUserInterrupt() so that very long runs can be aborted from R.
• A better error message (instead of a useless internal garbage message error) is now displayed when attempting to return threshold with ci.coords. An empirical ROC curve, like one produced by pROC, is is made of discrete points that concentrate all the possible thresholds. Lines are added to join the points visually on the plot, however they do not contain any actual threshold. Returning thresholds at an arbitrary sensitivity or specificity requires either to be very lucky to have a point at the exact desired value, or to interpolate thresholds between the points. Interpolating is more tricky than it sounds and is very sensitive to the method of calculation of the threshold (very different results will be returned by pROC that uses the mean between consecutive predictor, than by some other packages which use the values directly).

New algorithm

A new "meta" algorithm is introduced in the roc function. algorithm = 5 causes pROC to automatically select algorithm 2 or 3, based on the number of threshold of the ROC curve. Algorithm 3 has a time complexity of O(N^2). It behaves very well when the number of thresholds remains low. However its square term can cause a catastrophic slowdown with very large datasets where the predictor takes nearly continuous values, and the ROC curve contains many thresholds (typically this will become very obvious above 10000 thresholds). Algorithm 2 has an algorithmic complexity of O(N), and shows a much better performance with large number of data points. However it comes with a rather large pre-factor which makes it very inefficient in most small- to normal-sized datasets. The decisive factor is the number of thresholds, and pROC will select algorithm 2 in curves with more than about 1500 thresholds, 3 otherwise. Algorithm 5 is now the default algorithm in pROC which should significantly improve the performance with large datasets, without impacting the speed in most cases.

Getting the update

The update has just been submitted to the CRAN and should be online soon. Once it is out, update your installation by simply typing:

install.packages("pROC")

The full changelog is:

• Fix bug that crashed DeLong calculations when predictor had near-ties close to the floating point precision limit that were rounded back to a predictor value (issue #25).
• Fix bug that crashed ci.auc and var if direction was ">" and percent=TRUE (issue #25).
• Fix bug causing ci to return NaN values with method="delong" when cases or controls had a single observation (issue #27).
• Fix power.roc.curve failed with curves having percent=TRUE.
• Fix ci(..., of="coords") returned the ci function instead of the CI.
• C++ code now check for user interrupts regularly with Rcpp::checkUserInterrupt().
• Better error message for ci.coords attempting to return threshold.
• New algorithm = 5 (used by default) chooses the algorithm based on the number of thresholds to avoid worst case with algorithm = 3.

pROC 1.11.0 is now on CRAN! This is a minor update that mostly fixes notes in CRAN checks. It also adds support for the legacy.axes argument to change the axis labeling in ggroc.

The full changelog is:

• Added argument legacy.axes to ggroc
• Fix NOTE about "apparent S3 methods exported but not registered" in R CMD check

A new update of pROC is now available on CRAN: version 1.10.0.

ggplot2 support (Experimental)

A new function was introduced: ggroc. Given a roc object, or a (optionally named) list of roc objects, it returns a ggplot object, that can then be printed, with optional aesthetics, themes etc. Here is a basic example:

library(pROC)
# Create a basic roc object
data(aSAH)
rocobj <- roc(aSAH$outcome, aSAH$s100b)
rocobj2 <- roc(aSAH$outcome, aSAH$wfns)

library(ggplot2)
# Multiple curves:
gg2 <- ggroc(list(s100b=rocobj, wfns=rocobj2))
gg2

Basic ggplot with two ROC curves.

The usual ggplot syntax applies, so you can add themes, labels, etc. Note the aes argument, which control the aesthetics for geom_line to map to the different ROC curves supplied. Here we use "linetype" instead of the default color:

# with additional aesthetics:
gg2b <- ggroc(list(s100b=rocobj, wfns=rocobj2), aes="linetype", color="red")
# You can then your own theme, etc.
gg2b + theme_minimal() + ggtitle("My ROC curve")

Basic ggplot with two ROC curves.

This functionality is currently experimental and subject to change. Please report bugs and feedback on pROC's GitHub issue tracker.

Precision and recall in coords

The coords function supports two new ret values: "precision" and "recall":

library(pROC)
# Create a basic roc object
data(aSAH)
rocobj <- roc(aSAH$outcome, aSAH$s100b)
coords(rocobj, "best", ret = c("threshold", "sensitivity", "specificity", "precision", "recall"))
  threshold sensitivity specificity   precision      recall 
  0.2050000   0.6341463   0.8055556   0.6500000   0.6341463

It makes it very easy to get a Precision-Recall (PR) plot:

plot(precision ~ recall, t(coords(rocobj, "all", ret = c("recall", "precision"))), type="l", main = "PR plot of S100B")

A simple PR plot.

Automated testing

Several functions are now covered with tests (powered by the testthat package) to ensure correct behavior. This allowed me to find and fix a few glitches. It will also make it easier to refactor code in the future.

The tests are automatically run by R CMD check. Additional tests that are too slow to be enabled by defauld can be activated with the RUN_SLOW_TESTS environment variable.

export RUN_SLOW_TESTS=true
R CMD check pROC

Test results can be seen on Travis CI, and the coverage of the tests can be seen on Codecov. Currently 30% of the code is tested. This includes most functionality, with the exception of bootstrapping and smoothing which I plan to implement in the future.

Obtaining the update

To update your installation, simply type:

install.packages("pROC")

Here is the full changelog:

• Basic ggplot2 support (one and multiple ROC curves)
• Implement precision and recall for coords
• Fix: properly handle NAs in cases when passing cases/controls to roc (thanks Thomas König for the report)
• Fix various minor bugs detected with new unit tests

Can php's htmlspecialchars delete your data? The answer, unfortunately, is yes.

I just updated a database server with a web interface from PHP 5.3 (in Ubuntu 12.04) to PHP 7 (Ubuntu 16.04.2). It went pretty smoothly, but after a couple of weeks, users started reporting missing data in some fields where they were expecting some. After some investigation, it turns out the curlpit is the htmlspecialchars function, which changed behaviour with the update. Given the following script:

<?php 
$string = "An e acute character: \xE9\n";
echo htmlspecialchars($string);
?>

In PHP 5.3, it would output:

An e acute character: �

Now with PHP >= 5.4, here's the output:

Yep, that's correct: the output is empty. PHP just discarded the whole string. Without even a warning!

While this is documented in the manual, this is the most stupid and destructive design I have seen in a long while. Data loss guaranteed when the user saves the page without realizing some fields are accidentally empty! How can anyone be so brain dead and design and implement such a behaviour? Without even a warning!

It turns out one has to define the encoding for the function to work with non-UTF8 characters:

htmlspecialchars($string, ENT_COMPAT,'ISO-8859-1', true);

As this is a legacy application dating back more than 15 years, I fully expect some strings to be broken beyond repair. Thus I wrote the following function to replace all the calls to htmlspecialchars:

function safe_htmlspecialchars($string) {
	$htmlstring = htmlspecialchars($string, ENT_COMPAT,'ISO-8859-1', true);
  
        if (strlen($string) > 0 && strlen($htmlstring) == 0) {
                trigger_error ("htmlspecialchars failed to convert data", E_USER_ERROR);
        }
}

Displaying an error in case of doubt is the only sensible behaviour here, and should be the default.

Moral of the story: I'm never using PHP in a new project again. And neither should you, if you value your data more than the PHP developers who clearly don't.

After nearly two years since the previous release, pROC 1.9.1 is finally available on CRAN. Here is a list of the main changes:

• subset and na.action arguments now handled properly in roc.formula. This means you can now do something like this:
  

  data(aSAH)
  roc(outcome ~ s100b, data=aSAH, subset=(gender == "Male"))
  roc(outcome ~ s100b, data=aSAH, subset=(gender == "Female"))

  Thanks Terry Therneau for the report.
• Added policies to handle the case where a ROC curve has multiple "best" threshold in ci.coords. The following policies are available:
  • "stop" will abort the processing and throw an error (with stop). This is the default.
  • "omit" will ignore the sample (as in NULL). This can lead to a reduced effective number of usable sample in the final statistic.
  • "random" will select one of the threshold randomly.
  Here is an example of usage:
  

  data(aSAH)
  ci.coords(aSAH$outcome, aSAH$s100b, x="best", input = "threshold", 
            ret=c("specificity", "ppv", "tp"),
            best.policy = "random")

  Thanks Nicola Toschi for the report.
• Support xlim and ylim gracefully in plot.roc.
• Improved validation of input class levels and direction; A message can be printed when auto-detecting, use the quiet argument to turn on.
• Removed extraneous name attribute on the p.value (thanks Paweł Kleka for the report).
• Faster DeLong algorithm (code contributed by Stefan Siegert). The code is based on the algorithm by Xu Sun and Weichao Xu (2014) that has an O(N log N) complexity instead of O(N²).
  The DeLong algorithm is now always faster than bootstrapping, even in the previous edge case of ROC curve with large number of samples and few thresholds where bootstrapping used to be faster. Here is a quick example with 200000 data points:

  library(pROC)
  n <- 200000
  a <- as.numeric(cut(rnorm(n), c(-Inf, -1, 0, 1, Inf)))
  b <- round(runif(n))
  r <- roc(b, a, algorithm = 3)
  
  # With Bootstrap
  > system.time(var(r, method = "b", progress = "none"))
  utilisateur     système      écoulé 
       25.896       0.136      26.027 
  
  # With old DeLong algorithm
  > system.time(var(r, method = "d"))
  utilisateur     système      écoulé 
       47.352       0.008      47.353 
  
  # With new DeLong algorithm
  > system.time(var(r, method = "d"))
  utilisateur     système      écoulé 
        0.016       0.008       0.023 

Obtaining the update

To update your installation, simply type:

install.packages("pROC")

References

Xu Sun and Weichao Xu (2014) "Fast Implementation of DeLongs Algorithm for Comparing the Areas Under Correlated Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves". IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 21, 1389-1393. DOI: 10.1109/LSP.2014.2337313.

The last significant update of pROC, 1.7, was released a year ago, followed by some minor bug fix updates. In the meantime, the policies of the CRAN repository evolved, and are requiring a significant update of pROC.

Specifically, S3 methods in pROC have always been exported, which means that you could call auc.roc or roc.formula directly. This is not allowed any longer, and methods must now to be registered as such with S3method() calls in the NAMESPACE file. The upcoming version of pROC (1.8) will therefore feature a major cleanup of the namespace.

In practice, this could potentially break some of your code. Specifically, direct call to S3 methods will not work any longer. For instance, the following is incorrect:

rocobj <- roc(...)
smooth.roc(rocobj)

Although not documented, it used to work but that will no longer be the case. Instead, you should call the generic function that will dispatch to the proper method:

smooth(rocobj)

Other examples include for instance:

# Incorrect:
auc.roc(rocobj)
# Correct:
auc(rocobj)

# Incorrect:
var.roc(rocobj)
# Correct:
var(rocobj)

Please make sure you replace any call to a method with the generic. In doubt, consult the Usage section of pROC's manual.

pROC 1.7.3 was pushed to the CRAN a few minutes ago. It is a bugfix release that solves two issues with smoothing, the first of which is a significant numeric issue:

• Fixed AUC of binomial-smoothed ROC off by 100^2 (thanks Bao-Li Chang for the report)
• Fix print of logcondens-smoothed ROC

It should be available for update from CRAN in a few hours / days, depending on your operating system.

pROC 1.7.2 was published this morning. It is a bugfix release that primarily solves various issues with coords and ci.coords. It also warns when computing confidence intervals / roc tests of a ROC curves with AUC == 1 (the CI will always be 1-1 / p value 0) as this can potentially be misleading.

• Fixed bug where ci.coords with x="best" would fail if one or more resampled ROC curve had multiple "best" thresholds (thanks Berend Terluin for the report)
• Fixed bug in ci.coords: passing more than one value in x now works
• Fixed typo in documentation of direction argument to roc (thanks Le Kang for the report)
• Add a warning when computing statistics of ROC curve with AUC = 1
• Require latest version of Rcpp to avoid weird errors (thanks Tom Liptrot for the report)